Where several trades worked on the same area, responsibility needs a documented scope and sequence. Defend your position with evidence rather than counter-accusations.
Corporate Recovery Partners
01 / 06
The last contractor on site receives the blame
A flooring contractor is blamed for damaged skirting after several trades worked through a shop. The customer assumes the flooring crew caused it because it attended last. The contractor believes the damage existed earlier but has only scattered photographs. The task is to establish who did what and when, without turning uncertainty into an accusation against another trade.
Ask for the exact damage, date discovered and reason your work is said to be responsible. Match each item to a location rather than discussing the premises generally.
Keep the complaint intact. A precise description helps distinguish an installation fault from damage caused during access, storage or later work.
Compare contracts, work orders and the sequence of trades. Identify who controlled the area and when your team entered and left. Record handovers and any restrictions.
Do not assume responsibility follows who was present last. The relationship between the work, access and damage needs evidence, and contractual obligations may extend beyond the task description.
Gather dated photographs, site reports and factual staff recollections. Ask witnesses what they personally saw. Keep originals rather than annotating over the only copy.
Business.gov.au recommends checking facts and recording dispute discussions. Where technical cause is uncertain, seek an appropriately scoped assessment instead of asking staff to reach conclusions outside their knowledge.
Explain the relevant scope and sequence, identify supporting records and state what remains unknown. Invite a joint inspection or other suitable way to investigate the unresolved issue.
Notify relevant insurers or advisers where appropriate before making admissions or commitments. Keep payment questions and repair proposals clearly documented so a practical response is not mistaken for acceptance of every allegation. Preserve the sequence of handovers and later trades’ attendance, including any photographs showing the condition before they began their work.