Turn asset rumours into questions after an unpaid judgment
Evaluate the source, identity and currency of asset information before advising on judgment enforcement.
Corporate Recovery Partners
01 / 06
An asset lead is not yet an enforcement plan
You have an unpaid judgment and hear that the debtor owns valuable equipment. Give the information to your lawyer, but describe how you obtained it and when. A rumour may identify something worth checking. It does not establish ownership, available value or that a particular enforcement procedure is appropriate for your judgment.
Imagine a supplier holding judgment against a building company. A subcontractor says its director has a new excavator. Record that statement accurately and identify who supposedly owns the machine. Do not treat property attributed to the director as company property without evidence. The order's debtor and the person associated with an asset must not be casually substituted.
List the asset description, location, date observed and source of the information. Distinguish a public record from a photograph or a conversation. Do not obtain information through deception or unauthorised access. Ask the lawyer what lawful checks are useful and what documents would be needed before relying on the lead in an application.
NSW Courts describes an examination notice as a way to gather information about a judgment debtor's financial circumstances. That is NSW guidance, not a national instruction for every court. Ask your adviser whether an appropriate information process is available in your case and how it compares with acting on the information already held.
An asset may be financed, jointly owned, leased or subject to another claim. Ask what those uncertainties mean for the proposed recovery step. In the excavator example, an online sale price for a similar machine does not show what a creditor could recover. Avoid authorising expensive action based on the headline value alone.
Update the adviser if the asset is moved, sold or the original report proves incorrect. Record the result of each check and the remaining uncertainty. The purpose is to turn incomplete information into a sensible legal question, not to promise recovery because someone has seen the debtor using something valuable.