A payment offer after filing needs both commercial assessment and proper handling of the court case. Do not confuse an offer with cleared recovery.
Corporate Recovery Partners
01 / 06
A late offer asks the creditor to stand down too soon
A creditor files a winding-up application and then receives an offer to pay the invoice in two instalments. The debtor asks the creditor to stop attending court immediately. The creditor wants to recover its money, but must assess the offer’s funding, costs and procedural consequences before agreeing to stand down.
Record principal, interest, costs, instalment dates and any security offered. Check whether the debtor seeks a release now or only after performance. Distinguish an immediate cleared payment from a promise of future funds.
Ask for enough evidence to evaluate the proposed timing. A screenshot of a finance application does not establish that the money is available.
The Federal Court describes hearing and procedural requirements for winding-up applications. Ask your lawyer what steps are needed if an agreement is reached and what remains required meanwhile.
Do not simply miss the hearing because the debtor requested it. Any adjournment, dismissal or other proposed outcome needs to be handled through the proper process.
Ask about notices from other creditors and the implications for the proceeding. Section 465B of the Corporations Act allows court-ordered substitution in appropriate circumstances.
A bilateral settlement should not be described as guaranteeing that the company cannot be wound up. The lawyer should assess the actual case and any other party seeking to participate.
Retain signed terms, cleared-payment evidence and the actual procedural outcome. Reconcile the amount recovered against the agreed account and costs.
If the first instalment is missed, obtain advice under the agreement rather than assuming the original process can resume unchanged. A carefully documented settlement should make the next decision clearer, not create another uncertain dispute.