Distinguish commercial requested dates from legally significant deadlines in dispute correspondence.
Corporate Recovery Partners
01 / 06
Not every date has the same effect
You ask a customer to respond by Friday and add that date to the diary. At the same time, a contract notice or court document may require action on a different timetable. Keep those dates separate. A date chosen for a commercial request should not be treated as the source of a legal right or a replacement for a formal deadline.
Imagine a supplier waiting for a response to a disputed account while its lawyer prepares advice about proceedings. Record the requested reply date, the relevant document and who set it. Separately identify dates the lawyer says require action. Avoid a single calendar entry labelled deadline when staff cannot tell what happens if it passes.
business.gov.au says a letter of demand states the amount, reason and when payment is requested. It also stresses accuracy. Give the recipient a clear request and a date that reflects the circumstances. Do not describe your chosen date as a court order or statutory requirement unless that is actually the legal position confirmed by appropriate advice.
If the customer asks for more time, identify exactly which date they want changed. Ask the lawyer about any formal timetable before agreeing anything that may affect it. In the supplier's example, allowing more time for a commercial response should not silently lead the team to stop preparing a separate required filing or notice.
Name the person who checks the response and the person authorised to decide the next step. Include enough context to locate the correspondence quickly. A calendar reminder that nobody owns can disappear during leave or a busy week. Have a backup person know where the current instructions and supporting documents are stored.
When the requested date passes, check whether a response, payment or new information has arrived. Take the next lawful step based on the current facts and advice. A reliable date system supports consistent follow-up; it does not make every unanswered request enforceable or justify action that has not been properly assessed.